[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#796442: §5.5 Uploads to suites other than unstable/experimental should use codenames, not suites



Package: developers-reference
Version: 3.4.15
Severity: important
Tags: patch

As I understand the current Release Team practices (in X-Debbugs-CC), uploads
to non-unstable/experimental suites should nowadays rather use the codenames
(wheezy, wheezy-proposed-updates, wheezy-security or wheezy-lts) instead of
suites (oldstable, oldstable-proposed-updates, oldstable-security or
oldstable-lts). Although both styles work, using the codenames avoids
race-conditions in times around new stable releases, and are less confusing.

This could be a possible diff:

--- devref.orig.txt     2015-08-21 22:49:46.985614431 +0200
+++ devref.new.txt      2015-08-21 22:58:15.226984105 +0200
@@ -2209,9 +2209,10 @@
     from the first line of the debian/changelog file and places it in
     the Distribution field of the .changes file.
 
-    There are several possible values for this field: stable,
-    unstable, testing-proposed-updates and experimental. Normally,
-    packages are uploaded into unstable.
+    Packages are normally uploaded into unstable. Uploads to unstable or
+    experimental should use these suite names in the changelog entry;
+    uploads for other supported suites should use the suite codenames,
+    as they avoid any ambiguity.
 
     Actually, there are other possible distributions: codename
     -security, but read Section 5.8.5, “Handling security-related

Cheers, OdyX


Reply to: