Bug#755515: developers-reference: A bit strange wording in the NMU section
> Hi,
>
> > which feels a bit strange. I would suggest "that are blocking",
> > "that blocks", or maybe simply "blocking"
> >
> The second choice is not grammatically correct.
> "that block" is better.
>
> --
> -- Matthias Urlichs
Alright - New version of path attached.
-- Andreas Rönnquist
gusnan@gusnan.se
>From f4ba05b85255ac8de8f240626cce93fb4ae7249e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Andreas=20R=C3=B6nnquist?= <gusnan@gusnan.se>
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2014 20:13:43 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Fix typo in NMU section s/blocking/block/
---
pkgs.dbk | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/pkgs.dbk b/pkgs.dbk
index 873c42c..68af723 100644
--- a/pkgs.dbk
+++ b/pkgs.dbk
@@ -2059,7 +2059,7 @@ Other NMUs: 10 days
<para>
Those delays are only examples. In some cases, such as uploads fixing security
-issues, or fixes for trivial bugs that blocking a transition, it is desirable
+issues, or fixes for trivial bugs that block a transition, it is desirable
that the fixed package reaches <literal>unstable</literal> sooner.
</para>
--
2.0.1
Reply to: