Bug#755515: developers-reference: A bit strange wording in the NMU section
Source: developers-reference
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
Dear Maintainer,
The current version of the developers-reference contains the
following wording in the NMU section:
>> or fixes for trivial bugs that blocking a transition,
which feels a bit strange. I would suggest "that are blocking", "that
blocks", or maybe simply "blocking"
See the attached patch against current git for a suggestion on better
wording.
thanks and best regards
-- Andreas Rönnquist
gusnan@gusnan.se
-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 3.12-1-amd64 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=sv_SE.utf8, LC_CTYPE=sv_SE.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
>From bd9d8d20126ed5ee95e6802b2f967cd2fd6adb98 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Andreas=20R=C3=B6nnquist?= <gusnan@gusnan.se>
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2014 17:03:03 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Fix wording in NMU section
---
pkgs.dbk | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/pkgs.dbk b/pkgs.dbk
index 873c42c..a58a9ae 100644
--- a/pkgs.dbk
+++ b/pkgs.dbk
@@ -2059,7 +2059,7 @@ Other NMUs: 10 days
<para>
Those delays are only examples. In some cases, such as uploads fixing security
-issues, or fixes for trivial bugs that blocking a transition, it is desirable
+issues, or fixes for trivial bugs that blocks a transition, it is desirable
that the fixed package reaches <literal>unstable</literal> sooner.
</para>
--
2.0.1
Reply to: