[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#649530: [copyright-format] clearer definitions and more consistent License: stanza specification



On 13/01/12 01:14, Ximin Luo wrote:
> On 10/01/12 00:41, Ximin Luo wrote:
>> On 08/01/12 05:30, Steve Langasek wrote:
>>> On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 03:22:04PM -0600, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
>>>> Ximin Luo wrote:
>>>
>>>>> OK, understood. I will take a look at creating a patch for copyright-format.xml
>>>>> like you did. However, I think I would prefer using an explicit grammar instead
>>>>> (e.g. the sort that programming language specifications use), because that
>>>>> leads to clearer thinking and less ambiguity.
>>>
>>>>> Which would you prefer?
>>>
>>>> That's up to Steve, since he's the editor of the document.
>>>
>>>> I am personally of two minds --- on one hand, I would like to see the
>>>> copyright-format released quickly, which means making only minimal
>>>> changes to the document.  On the other hand, an explicit grammar would
>>>> indeed make the details of the spec easier to understand.
>>>
>>>> I guess if I were in your shoes, I'd keep a grammar in mind and make
>>>> sure the text specifies it unambiguously but use plain text so as to
>>>> make the changes not too invasive.
>>>
>>> It would be nice to have a formal grammar down the line, but that's also too
>>> large of a change for 1.0.
>>>
>>
>> Alright, I've set aside some time to work on this. I've checked out the SVN,
>> installed the build-deps (docbook-utils tidy), will send a patch soon.
>>
>> X
>>
> 
> Patch attached. I moved some stuff around as well, but not that much; hopefully
> the description is clear enough to explain everything.
> 
> X
> 

Hello again! Does anyone have any comments on this?

I see Charles Plessy has made some extra changes to DEP5 in SVN since I created
this patch, on 2012-02-02 (yesterday). Those changes don't conflict with this
patch, but could people have a look at it before any future changes do?

I could commit this directly to SVN if you guys prefer? (I've not tried yet,
since I don't know if I have access, and I don't want something to go wrong.)

X

-- 
GPG: 4096R/5FBBDBCE
https://github.com/infinity0
https://bitbucket.org/infinity0
https://launchpad.net/~infinity0

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Reply to: