debian-policy Nov 2012 by subject
![[First Page]](/images/first.png) |
[previous page]
|
Page 1 of 1 |
[next page]
|
![[Last Page]](/images/last.png) |
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
[Other Debian Lists]
[Debian Home]
Bug#208010: Admininstrator immédiate Répond maintenant
Bug#208010: Répondre à cet Avertissement Administration Immédiat ement
Bug#540852: Wishlist: describe when to use urgency values low, medium and high
Bug#542288: Version numbering: native packages, NMU's, and binary only uploads
Bug#663762: Bug#694282: openssh: uses too much system ressources to build
Bug#679326: debian-policy: DMUA should covered more explicitly
Bug#679326: debian-policy: DM-Upload-Allowed field is obsolete
Bug#691352: Typo in 8.6.4 (The shlibs system)
Bug#693793: New virtual packages: lv2-host and lv2-plugin
Bug#694384: Bug#694404: More info on cloned bug
Bug#694384: Clarify what first paragraph is in presence of blank lines
Bug#99933: Booking enquiry.............................
debian/copyright in case of multiple alternative licences
FYI: Requested update of the dbnpolicy group
Re: What is the use case for Policy §7.6.2 ?
Processed: user debian-policy@packages.debian.org, limit package to debian-policy, usertagging 691352 ...
What is the use case for Policy §7.6.2 ?
Re: What is the use case for Policy §7.6.2 ?
Re: What is the use case for Policy §7.6.2 ?
Re: What is the use case for Policy §7.6.2 ?
The last update was on 19:17 GMT Wed May 01. There are 29 messages. Page 1 of 1.
[Thread Index]
[Subject Index]
[Author Index]
[Other Debian Lists]
[Debian Home]
Mail converted by MHonArc
