Bug#23712: conflicting packages with the same conffile
- To: Raphael Hertzog <hertzog@debian.org>
- Cc: Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org>, 23712@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Bug#23712: conflicting packages with the same conffile
- From: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2011 21:18:28 -0600
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20110305031828.GA22914@elie>
- Reply-to: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>, 23712@bugs.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <20100821144710.GF22862@rivendell>
- References: <13706.12598.949480.662100@bylbo.nowhere.earth> <E0zDnSV-0007YP-00@night> <13807.4760.80799.521978@bylbo.nowhere.earth> <87lj83d8yo.fsf_-_@windlord.stanford.edu> <20100819084352.GB8057@rivendell> <87zkwg9ajj.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu> <20100821063501.GB22862@rivendell> <87mxsgwf0i.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu> <20100821144710.GF22862@rivendell>
Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Sat, 21 Aug 2010, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> Hm. All the words that I had intended to be there are there. I clearly
>> need to rephrase it somehow, though, if it's not clear. How about:
>>
>> When two packages both declare the same <tt>conffile</tt>, they may
>> see left-over configuration files from each other even though they
>> conflict with each other.
>
> I was confused by the comma. I supposed it was meant to split the whole
> sentence...
>
> But the second wording is better IMO.
Assuming that can be taken as a second, we have:
Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org> (message #75)
Raphael Hertzog <hertzog@debian.org> (message #70)
Russ, presumably
so I think this should be ready to go. Thanks for your work.
Reply to: