Re: tcl8.5 breaks dpkg-cross assumptions and multiarch
- To: debian-policy@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: tcl8.5 breaks dpkg-cross assumptions and multiarch
- From: Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org>
- Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2011 17:17:41 -0800
- Message-id: <877hcslvey.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu>
- In-reply-to: <20110131174653.GA31826@burratino> (Jonathan Nieder's message of "Mon, 31 Jan 2011 11:46:53 -0600")
- References: <20110131171615.GD4912@dream.aleph1.co.uk> <20110131174653.GA31826@burratino>
Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> writes:
> Wookey wrote:
>> Debian policy (8.2) says:
>> ---------------
>> It is recommended that supporting files and run-time support programs
>> that do not need to be invoked manually by users, but are nevertheless
>> required for the package to function, be placed (if they are binary)
>> in a subdirectory of /usr/lib, preferably under /usr/lib/package-name.
>> If the program or file is architecture independent, the recommendation
>> is for it to be placed in a subdirectory of /usr/share instead,
> [...]
>> For multiarch, or existing
>> dpkg-cross cross-compiling, to work, arch-dependent needs to mean
>> either form _or_ content (see below for elaboration).
> I always had thought that it's content and that the "if they are
> binary" is only a red herring. I agree with you that the policy ought
> to be clarified. Thanks for bringing this up.
Could someone file a bug about this to clarify the wording so that we
don't lose it?
--
Russ Allbery (rra@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
Reply to: