[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#578854: New wording for Conflicts, Breaks, and related sections



Jakub Wilk <jwilk@debian.org> writes:

> * Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org>, 2010-06-16, 11:07:
> >+	      continue to do so (but be aware that this is often an error
> >+	      that should be fixed rather than using <tt>Conflicts</tt> --
> >+	      see, for example, <ref id="binaries">),</item>
>
> I find the phrase in parentheses awkwardly worded. (I am not a native
> speaker.)

How about this:

+	      continue to do so (but be aware that this is often an error,
+	      and it should be fixed instead of using <tt>Conflicts</tt>.
+	      See, for example, <ref id="binaries">),</item>

-- 
 \         “I may disagree with what you say, but I will defend to the |
  `\        death your right to mis-attribute this quote to Voltaire.” |
_o__)                     —Avram Grumer, rec.arts.sf.written, May 2000 |
Ben Finney

Attachment: pgpTHt7ciCoMe.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: