Bug#522217: debian-policy: Drop requirement to pre-depend on x11-common
- To: 522217@bugs.debian.org
- Cc: debian-x@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Bug#522217: debian-policy: Drop requirement to pre-depend on x11-common
- From: Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org>
- Date: Fri, 07 Aug 2009 14:09:15 -0700
- Message-id: <87hbwjgwlg.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu>
- Reply-to: Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org>, 522217@bugs.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <87k52oxedy.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu> (Russ Allbery's message of "Sat\, 04 Jul 2009 15\:38\:33 -0700")
- References: <871vs5rx08.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu> <1239073718.6354.75.camel@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr> <20090422200851.GI17079@patate.is-a-geek.org> <87r5xfmm3u.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu> <20090620212950.GF15085@rivendell> <87skhulgl9.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu> <20090621141004.GA23858@pcpool00.mathematik.uni-freiburg.de> <878wjlxv60.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu> <20090629130628.GN1056@yellowpig> <871vp3q9bm.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu> <20090629190529.GS1056@yellowpig> <87k52oxedy.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu>
Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org> writes:
> If we were starting from scratch, I agree, but I'm not sure how to
> phrase that.
>
> Here's what I currently have, which has one second from Julien and
> previous seconds from Manoj and Raphaël for previous versions of the
> wording. I'd welcome any additional proposals for how to change the
> wording of the /etc/X11 section, but if there are more seconds for the
> way that I have it worded now, I'm currently inclined to apply this and
> go forward rather than spending more time on trying to find the right
> phrasing. Does that sound okay?
I have now applied this last proposed patch for the next release of
Policy.
--
Russ Allbery (rra@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
Reply to: