[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Add Debian revision number standards to policy?



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Thu, Nov 03, 2005 at 06:45:32PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> If I number it 1.2-0.1, it would mean it's no longer a native
> package.  Does that mean I should split it in an .orig.tar.gz and
> a diff?

On the contrary; Policy does not say that a native package can't have a - in
its version, it only says that *if* the package is non-native, the Debian
revision is the part after the last -.

This format for NMU version numbers of native packages (1.2 -> 1.2-0.1) is
the only one that provides unambiguous identification of NMUs and binNMUs by
version number alone, and it's the only one that's guaranteed not to collide
with the maintainer's versioning scheme.

- -- 
Steve Langasek                   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer                   to set it on, and I can move the world.
vorlon@debian.org                                   http://www.debian.org/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDapCxKN6ufymYLloRAhb+AKDIo5e+tTYlZioQKt42q2tQKP5CMgCgxEnJ
yBlQtdvqpbd88EiAK90mlZI=
=jfo/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Reply to: