On Mon, Jun 27, 2005 at 01:04:35PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: > Debian policy is still stuck requiring FHS 2.1, although a copy of FHS > 2.3 is included in the debian-policy package. As noted in bugs 212434 > and 230217, the changes needed to upgrade to 2.3 are not too large, and > consist of: > Seconds: > 2.2: > Martin Michlmayr > Matthias Urlichs > Scott James Remnant > Branden Robinson > 2.3: > I second moving to 2.3. We've already made significant progress > in that direction and the work remaining to be done seems easily > accomplished in the etch timeframe. > BTW, current LSB versions require these new versions of the FHS. Seconded, as long as Manoj's concerns are also addressed in the process (which I'm confident they will be). -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature