Re: FHS version for etch
Hi,
The reason this has not changed is because back in october, we
had a large, unresolved discussion both on the policy and the devel
mailing lists that went over the changes, point by point, and people
pointed out that there were obstacles to just recommending the move
to 2.3
I'll get around to summarizing the discussion in the next week
or so, if there is interest in getting to a resolution at this point;
but I would like to determine if there is any real issues with the
new FHS _before_ we modify policy.
manoj
--
"The shortest distance between two points is through Hell." Brian
Clark
Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
Reply to: