[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#250202: Get this over with



On Sun, Sep 19, 2004 at 11:47:55PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Sep 2004 02:43:52 +0200, Wouter Verhelst <wouter@grep.be> said: 
> > It's been a while since the last mail on this proposal, which
> > reached the required number of seconders ages ago. I'm assuming the
> > proposal has been accepted now, and turn this into an amendment. For
> > reference, the patch as it should be applied is as follows:
> 
> 	Sorry, lack of discussion does not imply consensus.

Of course not; but I'd say lack of opposition does. There had been none,
AFAIK. I didn't take Don's amendment into account when writing that
previous patch because I hadn't seen many people agree with his
suggestion; but I didn't see a mail saying "I don't like this" from him
either.

>  And getting seconds gets you into the proposal stage, and not into
>  the accepted amendment status.

That's not what policy-process.txt says[1], but I'll take your word for
it.

> 	There are still problems with this proposal: it would make all
>  affected packages instantly buggy (to be sure, a normal bug, and not
>  an RC bug), but we do tend to frown upon that.

(checks) Right. Grmbl. Okay.

> 	I propose that this be amended to initially just recommend
>  that packages create the readme file; and then when that has become
>  the way things are being done, then we can move to should/must.

Accepted.

> 	I would also be more comfortable if there were some indication
>  of a wider agreement (more aol posts, perhaps?), but I would take a
>  lack of protests as the silent majority being behind this proposal.

That's what I did; there were no protests, so I took that as a silent
majority being behind the proposal.

[1]   When a proposal in the BTS has acquired two seconds (apart from the
      proposer), it becomes a formal amendment.  The bug severity is raised
      to "normal" and the bug is retitled to _"[AMENDMENT DD/MM/YYYY] ..."_.

      in policy-process.txt on lines 163-165. I forgot about the
      severity, but oh well.

-- 
         EARTH
     smog  |   bricks
 AIR  --  mud  -- FIRE
soda water |   tequila
         WATER
 -- with thanks to fortune

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: