debian-policy Sep 2004 by thread
[
previous month
]
[
first page
]
[previous page]
Page 1 of 1
[next page]
[
last page
]
[
next month
]
[
Date Index
] [
Subject Index
] [
Author Index
] [
Other Debian Lists
] [
Debian Home
]
updates
anandk
<Possible follow-ups>
Updates
bauer
Bug#270020: debian-policy: virtual package request: mpd-client
Eric Wong
To Zimmerman's Shop Customers!
Tracey Suggs
Re: Bug#267142: debian-policy: Sections 10.4 and 6.1 are inconsistent (Posix doesn't say what you think it says)
Thomas Hood
Re: Bug#267142: debian-policy: Sections 10.4 and 6.1 are inconsistent (Posix doesn't say what you think it says)
Marco d'Itri
Re: Bug#267142: debian-policy: Sections 10.4 and 6.1 are inconsistent (Posix doesn't say what you think it says)
Thomas Hood
Bug#267142: debian-policy: Sections 10.4 and 6.1 are inconsistent (Posix doesn't say what you think it says)
Chris Waters
Re: Bug#267142: debian-policy: Sections 10.4 and 6.1 are inconsistent (Posix doesn't say what you think it says)
Thomas Hood
Bug#267142: debian-policy: Sections 10.4 and 6.1 are inconsistent (Posix doesn't say what you think it says)
Bill Allombert
Bug#267142: debian-policy: Sections 10.4 and 6.1 are inconsistent (Posix doesn't say what you think it says)
Clint Adams
Bug#267142: debian-policy: Sections 10.4 and 6.1 are inconsistent (Posix doesn't say what you think it says)
Chris Waters
Bug#267142: debian-policy: Sections 10.4 and 6.1 are inconsistent (Posix doesn't say what you think it says)
Clint Adams
Re: Bug#267142: debian-policy: Sections 10.4 and 6.1 are inconsistent (Posix doesn't say what you think it says)
Steve Langasek
Bug#267142: debian-policy: Sections 10.4 and 6.1 are inconsistent (Posix doesn't say what you think it says)
Thomas Bushnell BSG
Bug#267142: debian-policy: Sections 10.4 and 6.1 are inconsistent (Posix doesn't say what you think it says)
Thomas Bushnell BSG
Bug#267142: debian-policy: Sections 10.4 and 6.1 are inconsistent (Posix doesn't say what you think it says)
Chris Waters
Bug#267142: debian-policy: Sections 10.4 and 6.1 are inconsistent (Posix doesn't say what you think it says)
Clint Adams
Bug#267142: debian-policy: Sections 10.4 and 6.1 are inconsistent (Posix doesn't say what you think it says)
Thomas Bushnell BSG
Re: Bug#267142: debian-policy: Sections 10.4 and 6.1 are inconsistent (Posix doesn't say what you think it says)
Marco d'Itri
Re: Bug#267142: debian-policy: Sections 10.4 and 6.1 are inconsistent (Posix doesn't say what you think it says)
Thomas Hood
Re: Bug#267142: debian-policy: Sections 10.4 and 6.1 are inconsistent (Posix doesn't say what you think it says)
Marco d'Itri
Re: Bug#267142: debian-policy: Sections 10.4 and 6.1 are inconsistent (Posix doesn't say what you think it says)
Thomas Bushnell BSG
<Possible follow-ups>
Bug#267142: debian-policy: Sections 10.4 and 6.1 are inconsistent (Posix doesn't say what you think it says)
Clint Adams
Bug#267142: debian-policy: Sections 10.4 and 6.1 are inconsistent (Posix doesn't say what you think it says)
Thomas Bushnell BSG
Bug#267142: debian-policy: Sections 10.4 and 6.1 are inconsistent (Posix doesn't say what you think it says)
Clint Adams
Bug#267142: debian-policy: Sections 10.4 and 6.1 are inconsistent (Posix doesn't say what you think it says)
Thomas Bushnell BSG
Bug#267142: debian-policy: Sections 10.4 and 6.1 are inconsistent (Posix doesn't say what you think it says)
Clint Adams
Bug#267142: debian-policy: Sections 10.4 and 6.1 are inconsistent (Posix doesn't say what you think it says)
Thomas Bushnell BSG
Bug#267142: debian-policy: Sections 10.4 and 6.1 are inconsistent (Posix doesn't say what you think it says)
Clint Adams
Bug#267142: debian-policy: Sections 10.4 and 6.1 are inconsistent (Posix doesn't say what you think it says)
Thomas Bushnell BSG
Bug#267142: debian-policy: Sections 10.4 and 6.1 are inconsistent (Posix doesn't say what you think it says)
Clint Adams
Bug#267142: debian-policy: Sections 10.4 and 6.1 are inconsistent (Posix doesn't say what you think it says)
Thomas Bushnell BSG
Bug#267142: debian-policy: Sections 10.4 and 6.1 are inconsistent (Posix doesn't say what you think it says)
Clint Adams
Bug#267142: debian-policy: Sections 10.4 and 6.1 are inconsistent (Posix doesn't say what you think it says)
Thomas Bushnell BSG
Bug#267142: debian-policy: Sections 10.4 and 6.1 are inconsistent (Posix doesn't say what you think it says)
Clint Adams
Bug#267142: debian-policy: Sections 10.4 and 6.1 are inconsistent (Posix doesn't say what you think it says)
Thomas Bushnell BSG
Bug#267142: debian-policy: Sections 10.4 and 6.1 are inconsistent (Posix doesn't say what you think it says)
Clint Adams
Bug#267142: debian-policy: Sections 10.4 and 6.1 are inconsistent (Posix doesn't say what you think it says)
Thomas Bushnell BSG
Bug#267142: debian-policy: Sections 10.4 and 6.1 are inconsistent (Posix doesn't say what you think it says)
Clint Adams
Bug#267142: debian-policy: Sections 10.4 and 6.1 are inconsistent (Posix doesn't say what you think it says)
Thomas Bushnell BSG
Bug#267142: debian-policy: Sections 10.4 and 6.1 are inconsistent (Posix doesn't say what you think it says)
Clint Adams
Bug#267142: debian-policy: Sections 10.4 and 6.1 are inconsistent (Posix doesn't say what you think it says)
Thomas Bushnell BSG
Bug#267142: debian-policy: Sections 10.4 and 6.1 are inconsistent (Posix doesn't say what you think it says)
Clint Adams
Bug#267142: debian-policy: Sections 10.4 and 6.1 are inconsistent (Posix doesn't say what you think it says)
Thomas Bushnell BSG
Bug#267142: debian-policy: Sections 10.4 and 6.1 are inconsistent (Posix doesn't say what you think it says)
Colin Watson
Bug#267142: debian-policy: Sections 10.4 and 6.1 are inconsistent (Posix doesn't say what you think it says)
Thomas Bushnell BSG
Bug#267142: debian-policy: Sections 10.4 and 6.1 are inconsistent (Posix doesn't say what you think it says)
Colin Watson
Bug#267142: debian-policy: Sections 10.4 and 6.1 are inconsistent (Posix doesn't say what you think it says)
Thomas Bushnell BSG
Re: Bug#267142: debian-policy: Sections 10.4 and 6.1 are inconsistent (Posix doesn't say what you think it says)
Manoj Srivastava
Re: Bug#267142: debian-policy: Sections 10.4 and 6.1 are inconsistent (Posix doesn't say what you think it says)
Thomas Bushnell BSG
Re: Bug#267142: debian-policy: Sections 10.4 and 6.1 are inconsistent (Posix doesn't say what you think it says)
Andreas Barth
Bug#267142: debian-policy: Sections 10.4 and 6.1 are inconsistent (Posix doesn't say what you think it says)
Clint Adams
Bug#267142: debian-policy: Sections 10.4 and 6.1 are inconsistent (Posix doesn't say what you think it says)
Thomas Bushnell BSG
Bug#267142: debian-policy: Sections 10.4 and 6.1 are inconsistent (Posix doesn't say what you think it says)
Bill Allombert
Bug#267142: debian-policy: Sections 10.4 and 6.1 are inconsistent (Posix doesn't say what you think it says)
Russ Allbery
Bug#267142: debian-policy: Sections 10.4 and 6.1 are inconsistent (Posix doesn't say what you think it says)
Thomas Bushnell BSG
Re: Bug#267142: debian-policy: Sections 10.4 and 6.1 are inconsistent (Posix doesn't say what you think it says)
Andrew Suffield
Re: Bug#267142: debian-policy: Sections 10.4 and 6.1 are inconsistent (Posix doesn't say what you think it says)
Thomas Bushnell BSG
Re: Bug#267142: debian-policy: Sections 10.4 and 6.1 are inconsistent (Posix doesn't say what you think it says)
Russ Allbery
Re: Bug#270868: Should not implement "test" builtin
Thomas Hood
Re: Bug#270868: Should not implement "test" builtin
Clint Adams
Re: Bug#270868: Should not implement "test" builtin
Thomas Hood
Re: Bug#270868: Should not implement "test" builtin
Thomas Hood
Re: Bug#270868: Should not implement "test" builtin
Clint Adams
Re: Bug#270868: Should not implement "test" builtin
Thomas Hood
Re: Bug#270868: Should not implement "test" builtin
Clint Adams
Re: Bug#270868: Should not implement "test" builtin
Thomas Hood
Re: Bug#270868: Should not implement "test" builtin
Clint Adams
Re: Bug#270868: Should not implement "test" builtin
Thomas Bushnell BSG
Re: Bug#270868: Should not implement "test" builtin
Aaron M. Ucko
Re: Bug#270868: Should not implement "test" builtin
Marco d'Itri
Re: Bug#270868: Should not implement "test" builtin
Clint Adams
Re: Bug#270868: Should not implement "test" builtin
Marco d'Itri
Bug#267142: huh?
Thomas Bushnell BSG
Bug#267142: huh?
Clint Adams
Bug#267142: huh?
Thomas Bushnell BSG
Bug#267142: huh?
Clint Adams
Bug#267142: huh?
Thomas Bushnell BSG
Bug#267142: huh?
Clint Adams
Bug#267142: huh?
Thomas Bushnell BSG
Bug#267142: huh?
Clint Adams
Bug#267142: huh?
Thomas Bushnell BSG
Bug#267142: huh?
Clint Adams
Bug#267142: huh?
Thomas Bushnell BSG
Bug#267142: huh?
Clint Adams
Bug#267142: huh?
Thomas Bushnell BSG
Bug#267142: huh?
Clint Adams
Bug#267142: huh?
Thomas Bushnell BSG
Bug#267142: huh?
Colin Watson
Bug#267142: huh?
Thomas Bushnell BSG
Bug#267142: huh?
Colin Watson
Bug#267142: huh?
Thomas Bushnell BSG
minor edit to policy document section 1.4
Dan Warburton
Consider revising sections 2.2.4 statement
Dan Warburton
policy for "/etc/init.d/foo status"?
Christian Hammers
Re: policy for "/etc/init.d/foo status"?
Stefan Hornburg
Re: policy for "/etc/init.d/foo status"?
Steve Langasek
Bug#250202: Get this over with
Wouter Verhelst
Processed: Get this over with
Debian Bug Tracking System
Re: Bug#250202: Get this over with
Manoj Srivastava
Processed: Re: Bug#250202: Get this over with
Debian Bug Tracking System
Re: Bug#250202: Get this over with
Wouter Verhelst
Re: Bug#250202: Get this over with
Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt
Bug#250202: Get this over with
Marco d'Itri
Bug#250202: Get this over with
Wouter Verhelst
Bug#250202: Get this over with
Marco d'Itri
Bug#250202: Get this over with
Wouter Verhelst
Re: Bug#250202: mandate a common name for "patched source" and/or "unpacked source"
Manoj Srivastava
Bug#264434: marked as done (debian-policy: set default umask 002 for the user private groups use)
Debian Bug Tracking System
Re: Hi
geneanet
Bug#272603: debian-policy: no filename suffixes in bin directories
Dan Jacobson
Bug#272603: debian-policy: no filename suffixes in bin directories
Thomas Bushnell BSG
Bug#272603: debian-policy: no filename suffixes in bin directories
Dan Jacobson
Bug#272603: debian-policy: no filename suffixes in bin directories
Manoj Srivastava
Bug#272603: marked as done (debian-policy: no filename suffixes in bin directories)
Debian Bug Tracking System
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: Bug#272603: debian-policy: no filename suffixes in bin directories
Kevin B. McCarty
Re: Bug#272603: debian-policy: no filename suffixes in bin directories
Thomas Bushnell BSG
Re: Bug#272603: debian-policy: no filename suffixes in bin directories
Gürkan Sengün
Re: Bug#272603: debian-policy: no filename suffixes in bin directories
Christian Leimer
Re: Bug#272603: debian-policy: no filename suffixes in bin directories
Ola Lundqvist
Bug#272602: policy.pdf.gz: trailing blanks
Dan Jacobson
Bug#272602: marked as done (policy.pdf.gz: trailing blanks)
Debian Bug Tracking System
Re: Simplicity Pattern Co. AutoReply
BBNELSON07
Processed: trailing blanks in PDFs
Debian Bug Tracking System
Bug#273122: debian-policy: Minor grammatical correction in section 9.4
Eric Evans
Bug#273122: debian-policy: Minor grammatical correction in section 9.4
Christian Perrier
Re: Bug#273122: debian-policy: Minor grammatical correction in section 9.4
Steve Kowalik
Your Card Debt can be wipe clean
viki wells
Bug#273696: debian-policy: define "small file"
Dan Jacobson
Bug#257933: marked as done (debian-policy: "need" is undefined)
Debian Bug Tracking System
CVS srivasta: Routine fixing of policy bugs, thoug a new version of policy is
Debian Policy CVS
Mozilla extensions policy?
era+debian
The last update was on 19:24 GMT Fri Jun 21. There are 133 messages. Page 1 of 1.
[
previous month
]
[
first page
]
[previous page]
Page 1 of 1
[next page]
[
last page
]
[
next month
]
[
Date Index
] [
Subject Index
] [
Author Index
] [
Other Debian Lists
] [
Debian Home
]
Mail converted by
MHonArc