Re: Bug#146023: [PROPOSAL]: "libexec", or use of "lib" for binaries in lib* packages
On Fri, 29 Oct 2004, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> + If the program is architecture independent, the
> + recommendation is for it to be placed in a subdirectory of
> + <file>/usr/share</file> instead, preferably under
> + <file>/usr/lib/</file><var>package-name</var>.
Minor nit:
This should be <file>/usr/share/</file><var>package-name</var>
not <file>/usr/lib/</file><var>package-name</var>.
Don Armstrong
--
"...Yet terrible as UNIX addiction is, there are worse fates. If UNIX
is the heroin of operating systems, then VMS is barbiturate addiction, the
Mac is MDMA, and MS-DOS is sniffing glue. (Windows is filling your sinuses
with lucite and letting it set.) You owe the Oracle a twelve-step program."
--The Usenet Oracle
http://www.donarmstrong.com http://rzlab.ucr.edu
Reply to: