On Thu, Jun 24, 2004 at 03:51:34PM -0500, Joe Wreschnig wrote: > We have a lot to lose by demanding POSIX-sh-only scripts (lots of work > fixing scripts, lots of work in the future writing and maintainer > scripts); what do we have to gain? I think we should set our standard at > SUSv3. Agreed. To be clear, I think we want SUSv3 with the XSI extension, since that gets us 'type'. -- Colin Watson [cjwatson@flatline.org.uk]