[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#101162: marked as done ([OLD PROPOSAL] web apps data placement undefined within the document tree)



Your message dated Sun, 28 Mar 2004 17:45:26 +0200
with message-id <20040328154526.GD25294@mails.so.argh.org>
and subject line Has been fixed for more than six month
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Jun 2001 01:24:19 +0000
>From chirik@castlefur.com Sat Jun 16 20:24:19 2001
Return-path: <chirik@castlefur.com>
Received: from kangaroo.castlefur.com [::ffff:63.195.76.235] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 15BRIY-0004wf-00; Sat, 16 Jun 2001 20:24:18 -0500
Received: from kangaroo.castlefur.com (chirik@kangaroo.castlefur.com [63.195.76.235])
	by kangaroo.castlefur.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA10173
	for <maintonly@bugs.debian.org>; Sat, 16 Jun 2001 18:24:14 -0700
Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2001 18:24:11 -0700 (PDT)
From: Chirik <chirik@CastleFur.COM>
To: maintonly@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Oversite in file placement for web applications
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0106161804020.9204-100000@kangaroo.castlefur.com>
X-No-archive: yes
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Delivered-To: maintonly@bugs.debian.org

Package: debian-policy
Version: 3.5.5.0

  Section 12.5 defines the location of cgi-bin executables, program
documentation and the document root, but doesn't provide any standardized
location where web applications may place files required to be available in
the document tree, but are not part of documentation.

  For example, webmagick is a package to create indices of graphics in a
directory, for viewing via a web browser.  The index files it creates
reference both icons, and a javascript file, if javascript was selected when
the index was made, and supported by the client browser.  Lacking a better
location for these files, webmagick uses the url of /doc/webmagick/icons,
but these files are not actually part of the documentation - these are part
of the application.

  Because many sites may not allow external clients to access /doc for
security reasons, files such as this, which are required for an application
to run, should be placed in a seperate location.

  While I've used webmagick as an example, it's not the only application
like this.  mrtg, for example, also relies on it's icons being inside the
documentation directory.  Potentially, these files should be placed in a
consistent location that is seperate from any documentation, and set aside
specifically as a location for support files which need to be available via
HTTP.

-- 
      ___   ----------------------------------------------------------
     ' ) `\      Chirik  [The Squirrel]  --|--  chirik@castlefur.com
      /'  |_./<   Chirik's Homepage is still under construction :-(
     |   /'-.\`|
     `\ |/~\/>"   A squirrel's home is really a nutcracker's suite!
       `\\_<_  --[ Ascii by mustel ]----------------------------------
                  



---------------------------------------
Received: (at 101162-done) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Mar 2004 15:45:29 +0000
>From aba@not.so.argh.org Sun Mar 28 07:45:29 2004
Return-path: <aba@not.so.argh.org>
Received: from mail-in.m-online.net [62.245.150.237] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1B7cTY-0007Po-00; Sun, 28 Mar 2004 07:45:28 -0800
Received: from mail.m-online.net (svr14.m-online.net [192.168.3.144])
	by svr8.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FA634BF4E;
	Sun, 28 Mar 2004 17:45:27 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from sol.so.argh.org (ppp-82-135-4-50.mnet-online.de [82.135.4.50])
	by mail.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A8636AA10;
	Sun, 28 Mar 2004 17:45:27 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from aba by sol.so.argh.org with local (Exim 4.22 #1 (Debian) [+prerelease])
	id 1B7cTW-00076R-AV; Sun, 28 Mar 2004 17:45:26 +0200
Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 17:45:26 +0200
From: Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org>
To: 23661-done@bugs.debian.org, 27205-done@bugs.debian.org,
	33251-done@bugs.debian.org, 36151-done@bugs.debian.org,
	37999-done@bugs.debian.org, 39125-done@bugs.debian.org,
	42870-done@bugs.debian.org, 43724-done@bugs.debian.org,
	51473-done@bugs.debian.org, 54985-done@bugs.debian.org,
	62768-done@bugs.debian.org, 63598-done@bugs.debian.org,
	65578-done@bugs.debian.org, 71805-done@bugs.debian.org,
	78014-done@bugs.debian.org, 79541-done@bugs.debian.org,
	82595-done@bugs.debian.org, 83669-done@bugs.debian.org,
	85500-done@bugs.debian.org, 88058-done@bugs.debian.org,
	100586-done@bugs.debian.org, 101162-done@bugs.debian.org,
	102917-done@bugs.debian.org, 109171-done@bugs.debian.org,
	119559-done@bugs.debian.org, 191036-done@bugs.debian.org,
	197835-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Has been fixed for more than six month
Message-ID: <20040328154526.GD25294@mails.so.argh.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
X-Editor: Vim http://www.vim.org/
Delivered-To: 101162-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
	version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Hi,

this bug was set to the status "fixed" more than six month ago, so I'm
closing it now. For an announcement of this, see
http://lists.debian.org/debian-policy/2004/debian-policy-200403/msg00042.html


Cheers,
Andi
-- 
   http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
   PGP 1024/89FB5CE5  DC F1 85 6D A6 45 9C 0F  3B BE F1 D0 C5 D1 D9 0C



Reply to: