Bug#100586: marked as done ([OLD PROPOSAL] Upstream patches should be separated from Debian ones.)
Your message dated Sun, 28 Mar 2004 17:45:26 +0200
with message-id <20040328154526.GD25294@mails.so.argh.org>
and subject line Has been fixed for more than six month
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Jun 2001 10:43:35 +0000
>From david.martinez@rediris.es Tue Jun 12 05:43:35 2001
Return-path: <david.martinez@rediris.es>
Received: from chico.rediris.es [::ffff:130.206.1.3]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 159le2-0002HX-00; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 05:43:34 -0500
Received: from snuggle (snuggle.rediris.es [130.206.1.171])
by chico.rediris.es (8.11.0/8.9.1) with SMTP id f5CAhMn09971
for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 12:43:22 +0200 (MET DST)
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
From: David Martinez CSIC RedIRIS <david.martinez@rediris.es>
Organization: Centro de Comunicaciones CSIC/RedIRIS
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: [PROPOSAL] Upstream patches should be separated from Debian ones.
Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 12:43:21 +0200
X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <01061212432136.00872@snuggle>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Package: debian-policy
Version: 3.5.5.0
Severity: wishlist
Hello. If you haven't followed the discussion in debian-devel:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-0106/threads.html
Quoting Theodore Tso:
> One of the reasons why I wasn't particularly happy with Debian a
> number of years ago (and recommended a large number of people not to
> use it) was when I discovered that a large number of changes were
> being made to e2fsprogs, and they were all in one single .diff file,
> so it was a real pain in the *ss to figure out what the heck was going
> on.
>
> When the .diff file gets that's big, it becomes to hard to track what
> bugs are the upstream's maintainer, and which ones were introduced by
> the Debian specific maintainer. [...]
Well, I'd propose to make an addition to Policy and/or NM Guide:
"Please note that in order to separate changes to the upstream sources for
Debian-only issues and bug-fixing issues, we (strongly?) recommend to
maintain an isolated set of patches only related to fix things not present in
upstream sources.
In such way, adopting an orphaned package become easier (the new maintainer
will know very fast the changes made to the upstream sources), and the
upstream author could know what are the changes that Debian maintainer is
doing to the software."
What do you think? Note the "should", not a "must".
Sincerely,
Ender.
-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Kernel Version: Linux snuggle 2.4.5 #47 mar jun 5 09:20:54 CEST 2001 i686
unknown
Versions of the packages debian-policy depends on:
ii fileutils 4.1-2 GNU file management utilities.
--
Why is a cow? Mu. (Ommmmmmmmmm)
--
Responsable de News - Newsmanager
Servicios de red - Network services
Centro de Comunicaciones CSIC/RedIRIS
Spanish Academic Network for Research and Development
Madrid (Spain)
Tlf 91.585.49.05
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 100586-done) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Mar 2004 15:45:29 +0000
>From aba@not.so.argh.org Sun Mar 28 07:45:29 2004
Return-path: <aba@not.so.argh.org>
Received: from mail-in.m-online.net [62.245.150.237]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1B7cTY-0007Po-00; Sun, 28 Mar 2004 07:45:28 -0800
Received: from mail.m-online.net (svr14.m-online.net [192.168.3.144])
by svr8.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FA634BF4E;
Sun, 28 Mar 2004 17:45:27 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from sol.so.argh.org (ppp-82-135-4-50.mnet-online.de [82.135.4.50])
by mail.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A8636AA10;
Sun, 28 Mar 2004 17:45:27 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from aba by sol.so.argh.org with local (Exim 4.22 #1 (Debian) [+prerelease])
id 1B7cTW-00076R-AV; Sun, 28 Mar 2004 17:45:26 +0200
Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 17:45:26 +0200
From: Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org>
To: 23661-done@bugs.debian.org, 27205-done@bugs.debian.org,
33251-done@bugs.debian.org, 36151-done@bugs.debian.org,
37999-done@bugs.debian.org, 39125-done@bugs.debian.org,
42870-done@bugs.debian.org, 43724-done@bugs.debian.org,
51473-done@bugs.debian.org, 54985-done@bugs.debian.org,
62768-done@bugs.debian.org, 63598-done@bugs.debian.org,
65578-done@bugs.debian.org, 71805-done@bugs.debian.org,
78014-done@bugs.debian.org, 79541-done@bugs.debian.org,
82595-done@bugs.debian.org, 83669-done@bugs.debian.org,
85500-done@bugs.debian.org, 88058-done@bugs.debian.org,
100586-done@bugs.debian.org, 101162-done@bugs.debian.org,
102917-done@bugs.debian.org, 109171-done@bugs.debian.org,
119559-done@bugs.debian.org, 191036-done@bugs.debian.org,
197835-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Has been fixed for more than six month
Message-ID: <20040328154526.GD25294@mails.so.argh.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
X-Editor: Vim http://www.vim.org/
Delivered-To: 100586-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Hi,
this bug was set to the status "fixed" more than six month ago, so I'm
closing it now. For an announcement of this, see
http://lists.debian.org/debian-policy/2004/debian-policy-200403/msg00042.html
Cheers,
Andi
--
http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
PGP 1024/89FB5CE5 DC F1 85 6D A6 45 9C 0F 3B BE F1 D0 C5 D1 D9 0C
Reply to: