debian-policy Dec 2003 by subject

[First Page] <
[previous page]
Page 1 of 1 >
[next page]
[Last Page]

[Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index] [Other Debian Lists] [Debian Home]
Re: Automated reply Re: Bad version number based on date advice in policy? Re: Bug#203098: debian-policy: using <link rel="..."> would be nice Bug#218893: Proposal: debian/rules.version file [Fix for the build-arch problem] Bug#222553: policy 11.5.3 refers to using the menu package to register docs Bug#222779: Bug#161593: [PROPOSAL] definition of deb binary files Bug#222779: debian-policy: [PROPOSAL] deb specifications and signed debs extension Bug#222779: [PROPOSAL] definition of deb binary files Bug#224509: Acknowledgement ([PROPOSAL] Correct spurious promise regarding TTY availability) Bug#224509: [PROPOSAL] Correct spurious promise regarding TTY availability Bug#224770: debian-policy: incorrect tar example deb manipulation Bug#225465: debian-policy: packages must give choice to not start at boot, via debconf Bug#225465: Suggested course of action to close this bug Debian-Policy and FHS 2.1 vs 2.2 draft proposal for a new web server policy Mass bug filing potential: (x-)www-browser Provides mozilla-* / myspell-* and their Provides: / Suggests: Processed: Re: Bug#203098: debian-policy: using <link rel="..."> would be nice Should we allow packages to depend on packages with lower priority values? URI Enclosure in Angled Glyphs The last update was on 18:36 GMT Sun Aug 16. There are 91 messages. Page 1 of 1.

<<
[previous month]
|<
[first page]
<
[previous page]
Page 1 of 1
>
[next page]
>|
[last page]
>>
[next month]

[Thread Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Other Debian Lists] [Debian Home]

Mail converted by MHonArc