debian-policy Dec 2003 by subject
|
[previous page]
|
Page 1 of 1 |
[next page]
|
|
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
[Other Debian Lists]
[Debian Home]
Re: Automated reply
Re: Bad version number based on date advice in policy?
Re: Bug#203098: debian-policy: using <link rel="..."> would be nice
Bug#218893: Proposal: debian/rules.version file [Fix for the build-arch problem]
Bug#222553: policy 11.5.3 refers to using the menu package to register docs
Bug#222779: Bug#161593: [PROPOSAL] definition of deb binary files
Bug#222779: debian-policy: [PROPOSAL] deb specifications and signed debs extension
Bug#222779: [PROPOSAL] definition of deb binary files
Bug#224509: Acknowledgement ([PROPOSAL] Correct spurious promise regarding TTY availability)
Bug#224509: [PROPOSAL] Correct spurious promise regarding TTY availability
Bug#224770: debian-policy: incorrect tar example deb manipulation
Bug#225465: debian-policy: packages must give choice to not start at boot, via debconf
Bug#225465: Suggested course of action to close this bug
Debian-Policy and FHS 2.1 vs 2.2
draft proposal for a new web server policy
Mass bug filing potential: (x-)www-browser Provides
mozilla-* / myspell-* and their Provides: / Suggests:
Processed: Re: Bug#203098: debian-policy: using <link rel="..."> would be nice
Should we allow packages to depend on packages with lower priority values?
URI Enclosure in Angled Glyphs
The last update was on 18:36 GMT Sun Aug 16. There are 91 messages. Page 1 of 1.
[Thread Index]
[Subject Index]
[Author Index]
[Other Debian Lists]
[Debian Home]
Mail converted by MHonArc