On Thu, Jun 12, 2003 at 02:01:14PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote: > On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 10:21:14PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > > How exactly would you state that, then? Note that a footnote in this [...] > > Something like: > > If a source package only build architecture-independant packages, the > difference between Build-Depends and Build-Depends-Indep is that only > Build-Depends is required to be satisfied for the "clean" rule. Hence > you should usually use Build-Depends. Sounds good. I won't object to such a paragraph, although I'd think it's not really necessary (since arch:all only source packages don't really need the distinction between build-depends and build-depends-indep anyway. See my other post on the subject.) -- Wouter Verhelst Debian GNU/Linux -- http://www.debian.org Nederlandstalige Linux-documentatie -- http://nl.linux.org "An expert can usually spot the difference between a fake charge and a full one, but there are plenty of dead experts." -- National Geographic Channel, in a documentary about large African beasts.
Attachment:
pgpAsbVcTj6wo.pgp
Description: PGP signature