[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bad version number based on date advice in policy?



On Sun, Dec 07, 2003 at 03:47:07PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:

> Epochs are more inelegant because they never go away, and rather have a
> tendency of needing increases, which has a tendency of getting more confusing;
> the ^(0\.)+ parts, on the other hand, disappear when the program authors
> migrate to 1.0 or whatever.

Unless they go from <date> to 0.x (or 0.0.x, which happened to one of my
packages).

-- 
 - mdz



Reply to: