Bug#208010: [PROPOSAL] init script LSB 1.3 compliance (revised)

To: 208010@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Bug#208010: [PROPOSAL] init script LSB 1.3 compliance (revised)
From: Andrew Suffield <asuffield@debian.org>
Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2003 16:57:56 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 20030901155755.GD20921@doc.ic.ac.uk>
Reply-to: Andrew Suffield <asuffield@debian.org>, 208010@bugs.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20030901151137.GA28406@sunflower.provective.de>
References: <20030831111138.GA20044@carlos.godisch.de> <[🔎] 20030901085850.GB31043@carlos.godisch.de> <[🔎] 20030901151137.GA28406@sunflower.provective.de>

On Mon, Sep 01, 2003 at 05:11:37PM +0200, Stefan Gybas wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 01, 2003 at 10:58:50AM +0200, Martin Godisch wrote:
> 
> > Attached an updated proposal, without exit code 5 clause.
> 
> I second this updated proposal.
> 
> I think status should be mandatory so it could be used by maintainer scripts
> on package upgrades.

You can't make it mandatory before you implement it.

-- 
  .''`.  ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
 : :' :  http://www.debian.org/ |
 `. `'                          |
   `-             -><-          |

Attachment: pgp2DddoOdL5j.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Bug#208010: [PROPOSAL] init script LSB 1.3 compliance (revised)
  - From: Stefan Gybas <sgybas@debian.org>

References:
- Bug#208010: [PROPOSAL] init script LSB 1.3 compliance (revised)
  - From: Martin Godisch <martin@godisch.de>
- Bug#208010: [PROPOSAL] init script LSB 1.3 compliance (revised)
  - From: Stefan Gybas <sgybas@provective.de>

Prev by Date: Bug#208010: [PROPOSAL] init script LSB 1.3 compliance (revised)
Next by Date: Bug#208010: [PROPOSAL] init script LSB 1.3 compliance (revised)
Previous by thread: Bug#208010: [PROPOSAL] init script LSB 1.3 compliance (revised)
Next by thread: Bug#208010: [PROPOSAL] init script LSB 1.3 compliance (revised)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread