Re: cdbs and Build-Depends-Indep
On Mon, Jun 16, 2003 at 07:40:34PM -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
> Well, probably the main reason we haven't hit this before is that most
> people don't bother to do a proper arch/indep split in their packages,
> and just stuff everything into Build-Depends.
That is not true, look at bug #148932
On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 11:50:16AM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> When I do it, I ignore what policy says and do what works. That means
> the build target is a no-op (or possibly an alias for build-arch), and
> everything else behaves as expected.
Exactly my view. Personnally I just use
It is a long time that all my multi-binary packages implement that.