Small problems about the restructured Policy
Hello maintainers,
Here are some questions about the text of the policy, cvs version 1.119.
L806:
The package name is part of the file name of the
<tt>.deb</tt> file and is included in the control field
information.
and is included in Package field of the "control" file?
L1294:
Packages which use the Debian Configuration management
specification may contain an additional
<prgn>config</prgn> script and a <tt>templates</tt>
file in their control archive.
their control archive = their Debian dir?
L1674:
Shouldn't the footnote be placed after the second paragraph?
L1922:
The <tt>binary</tt> target must be all that is
necessary for the user to build the binary package(s)
produced from this source package. All of these
targets are required to be non-interactive. It is
split into two parts: <prgn>binary-arch</prgn> builds
the binary packages which are specific to a particular
architecture, and <tt>binary-indep</tt> builds
those which are not.
Shouldn't the <p> start with " All of these...non-interactive."?
L2233:
<heading>Source package control files -- <file>debian/control</file></heading>
Why the "s" to "files"?
L2354:
When unpacking, it is checked against
the files and directories in the other parts of the
source package (see).
see what?
L2550:
See <ref id="pkg-debianrules"> for information how to get the
architecture for the build process.
Shouldn't the link be <ref id="debianrules">?
id="pkg-debianrules" points to id="debianrules".
L6084:
Registration of MIME type handlers allows programs like mail
user agents and web browsers to to invoke these handlers to
to to
L8432:
<sect id="changelogs">
<heading>Changelog files</heading>
You have not created a link to the chapt 4 : See <ref id="dpkgchangelog">.
And chapt 4 has a link to <ref id="changelogs"> L1670 which refers to
the appendix : a loop?
L9490:
<sect1>
<heading>Restrictions on objects in source packages</heading>
The paragraphs have not been removed.
No link to chap 4 : See <sect id="restrictions">.
Regards,
--
Philippe Batailler
Reply to: