Bug#99933: second attempt at more comprehensive unicode policy
On Jan 04, Colin Walters <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>> We may want a BOM, at the start, though.
>We don't need one for UTF-8. That's another one of the great things
What do you know about international environments? Maybe you do not need
a BOM because your native language needs just ASCII and you do not have
any text file encoded with latin-1, but in the rest of the world the
situation is quite different.
I propose a new policy amendment: developers whose native language is
english should not discuss i18n-related policy matters.