[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#99933: second attempt at more comprehensive unicode policy

On Jan 04, Colin Walters <walters@debian.org> wrote:

 >> We may want a BOM, at the start, though.
 >We don't need one for UTF-8.  That's another one of the great things
 >about it.
What do you know about international environments? Maybe you do not need
a BOM because your native language needs just ASCII and you do not have
any text file encoded with latin-1, but in the rest of the world the
situation is quite different.

I propose a new policy amendment: developers whose native language is
english should not discuss i18n-related policy matters.


Reply to: