[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#99933: second attempt at more comprehensive unicode policy

On Jan 04, Robert Bihlmeyer <robbe@orcus.priv.at> wrote:

 >Considering old standards broken because a newer one exists is just

 >> I've noticed that UTF-8 sometimes makes zsh unhappy, [...]
 >That's quite an understatement. The commandline editor can't deal with
 >multibyte characters in any way. So for example entering an o umlaut
 >and then deleting it gets you in trouble, because zsh does not handle
 >the two byte sequence as one character.
The same applies to bash. There has been patch in the BTS for a very
long time but it has never been applied.


Reply to: