Hi Roland! You wrote: > >> Policy applies to all packages, whether they state that they comply > >> with it yet or not. I'd also go with "should" in the meantime until > >> a survey is done and we know how many changelogs need to be fixed, > >> but I think in the long run it ought to be mandatory. > > > > Ok, fair enough. Here's a patch which makes it a "should". Given > > my sample with lintian though, I don't think we'll have too many > > packages to fix. > > > > Any seconds? > > I hereby second this proposal. I second it, too. -- Kind regards, +--------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Bas Zoetekouw | GPG key: 0644fab7 | |----------------------------| Fingerprint: c1f5 f24c d514 3fec 8bf6 | | bas@o2w.nl, bas@debian.org | a2b1 2bae e41f 0644 fab7 | +--------------------------------------------------------------------+
Attachment:
pgpM5NWHPFsuH.pgp
Description: PGP signature