Re: RFD: Essential packages, /, and /usr

[Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>]

On Tue, Jun 18, 2002 at 03:56:12AM -0400, Clint Adams wrote:
> 
> I'd be happy with SUSv3, UP relevant to non-interactive use, and the
> appropriate subset of XSI.  Of course, you realize that this reverses
> the 'echo -n' exception and that people will cry.

I have nothing against keeping the echo -n clause.

> The other problem, then, is that we will have a situation wherein no shell
> in Debian would be suitable as /bin/sh (unless I'm assuming incorrectly
> about pdksh).

Please be more specific.
-- 
Debian GNU/Linux 2.2 is out! ( http://www.debian.org/ )
Email:  Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org