Re: RFD: Essential packages, /, and /usr

To: debian-policy@lists.debian.org
Cc: debian-policy@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: RFD: Essential packages, /, and /usr
From: Scott Dier <dieman@ringworld.org>
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2002 09:07:37 -0500
Message-id: <[🔎] 3D0F3EA9.4020304@ringworld.org>
References: <[🔎] 20020617043759.GP23873@deadbeast.net> <[🔎] E17Jsb3-0001sE-00@gondolin.me.apana.org.au> <[🔎] 20020618050025.GA20429@dman.com> <[🔎] 20020618052455.GG23873@deadbeast.net> <[🔎] 20020618075023.GA24644@dman.com> <[🔎] 20020618080849.GA708@cs140102.pp.htv.fi>

Richard Braakman wrote:

The irony is that the only reason to use which is to accomodate speed
freaks who want to be able to use non-bash shells.  Now they get hit

Or wackos who code using tcsh. :) (yes, i know about the csh programmingconsidered harmful. I guess I'll just use perl instead.)


--
Scott Dier <dieman@ringworld.org> http://www.ringworld.org/



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Reply to:

References:
- Re: RFD: Essential packages, /, and /usr
  - From: Branden Robinson <branden@debian.org>
- Re: RFD: Essential packages, /, and /usr
  - From: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
- Re: RFD: Essential packages, /, and /usr
  - From: Clint Adams <schizo@debian.org>
- Re: RFD: Essential packages, /, and /usr
  - From: Branden Robinson <branden@debian.org>
- Re: RFD: Essential packages, /, and /usr
  - From: Clint Adams <schizo@debian.org>
- Re: RFD: Essential packages, /, and /usr
  - From: Richard Braakman <dark@xs4all.nl>

Prev by Date: Re: RFD: Essential packages, /, and /usr
Next by Date: Re: RFD: Essential packages, /, and /usr
Previous by thread: Re: RFD: Essential packages, /, and /usr
Next by thread: Re: RFD: Essential packages, /, and /usr
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread