Re: RFD: Essential packages, /, and /usr
> The irony is that the only reason to use which is to accomodate speed
> freaks who want to be able to use non-bash shells. Now they get hit
> by the bash startup time anyway. And those same speed freaks are
> likely to be using ash, which has both "type" and "command -v".
I believe that Herbert's proposal solves this.
> I once again recommend a deathmatch between ash and zsh fans. Let
> the best shell win.
bash doesn't even get to compete?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to:
- References:
- Re: RFD: Essential packages, /, and /usr
- From: Branden Robinson <branden@debian.org>
- Re: RFD: Essential packages, /, and /usr
- From: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
- Re: RFD: Essential packages, /, and /usr
- From: Clint Adams <schizo@debian.org>
- Re: RFD: Essential packages, /, and /usr
- From: Branden Robinson <branden@debian.org>
- Re: RFD: Essential packages, /, and /usr
- From: Clint Adams <schizo@debian.org>
- Re: RFD: Essential packages, /, and /usr
- From: Richard Braakman <dark@xs4all.nl>