[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#75508: marked as done (packaging-manual: a wrong example)



Your message dated Wed, 23 Jan 2002 03:00:36 +0800
with message-id <3C4DB6D4.7090907@debian.org>
and subject line close
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Oct 2000 21:14:35 +0000
>From zw@zhaoway.com Tue Oct 24 16:14:35 2000
Return-path: <zw@zhaoway.com>
Received: from (dumblink.loony) [::ffff:203.93.165.233] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 13oBOx-0005AH-00; Tue, 24 Oct 2000 16:14:35 -0500
Received: from zw by dumblink.loony with local (Exim 3.16 #1 (Debian))
	id 13oBV8-0008Hi-00; Wed, 25 Oct 2000 05:20:54 +0800
From: zhaoway <zw@zhaoway.com>
Subject: packaging-manual: a wrong example
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Mailer: bug 3.3.6
Message-Id: <E13oBV8-0008Hi-00@dumblink.loony>
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2000 05:20:54 +0800
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org

Package: packaging-manual
Version: 3.2.1.0
Severity: normal

in chapter 1, there is an example as listed by:
$ grep tar /usr/share/doc/packaging-manual/packaging.html/ch-binarypkg.html 

dpkg --fsys-tarfile <var>filename</var>.deb | tar xof usr/doc/<var>\*</var>copyright | less
                                                  ^^^
which i think should be:

dpkg --fsys-tarfile drscheme_103-7_i386.deb | tar Ox ./usr/share/doc/drscheme/copyright | less
                                                  ^^^^
?? or is that something related to different tar versions? Or that my
package broken? :-) But may sounds unlikely. :-)

-- System Information
Debian Release: woody
Kernel Version: Linux dumblink 2.4.0-test9 #1 Îå 10ÔÂ 13 06:35:41 CST 2000 i686 unknown

Versions of the packages packaging-manual depends on:
ii  fileutils      4.0z-2         GNU file management utilities.

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 75508-done) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Jan 2002 18:52:17 +0000
>From zw@debian.org Tue Jan 22 12:52:17 2002
Return-path: <zw@debian.org>
Received: from (jlonline.com) [61.155.13.238] 
	by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 16T61p-0007yr-00; Tue, 22 Jan 2002 12:52:17 -0600
Received: from debian.org([202.111.10.19]) by js.cn(AIMC 2.9.5.2)
	with SMTP id jm23c4df4d8; Wed, 23 Jan 2002 02:46:25 +0800
Message-ID: <3C4DB6D4.7090907@debian.org>
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2002 03:00:36 +0800
From: zhaoway <zw@debian.org>
Organization: Debian GNU/Linux
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i586; en-US; rv:0.9.7) Gecko/20011229
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: 75508-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: close
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=GB2312
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: 75508-done@bugs.debian.org

since it's tagged wontfix. and i fogget all the gory details involve
that erport. hereby close it.



Reply to: