Bug#119559: Processed: reassign
Hi,
What kind of policy support is required for this? Policy does
not claim to be exhaustive about the package description, so the
package management tools can add and and on headers in the
description themselves with impunity.
Personally, I don't see how this solves the problem, and I am
definitely not sure this is the optimal solution.
The way policy works is to allow solutions to be tried out in
the wilds, and when something has been tweaked to work, policy is
used to document the working solution. Policy should rarely be used
in the design phase.
manoj
--
It's appositival, if it's there. And it doesn't have to be
there. And it's really obvious that it's there when it's there. Larry
Wall in <199709032332.QAA21669@wall.org>
Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
Reply to: