[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Should debian policy require to use debconf for postinst scripts?



On Fri, Dec 07, 2001 at 07:58:26PM +0100, Massimo Dal Zotto wrote:
> The lack of automatic installation is the reason why I don't install
> Debian any more for my customers.

Oh, and to clarify: I completely agree. This is, IMO, the biggest missing
feature in Debian at the moment.

But the way to go about ensuring that feature is implemented is for the
people who care about it to send in patches and talk to the maintainers of
packages who have problems with the patches sent in. There's obviously
a whole bunch of people interested in this: subscribe to debian-qa,
make a list of packages, and start fixing them.

Imagining that changing policy is like waving a magic wand and'll suddenly
make everything all wonderful and work just the way you want it to with
no effort on your part is a delusion. Forget it, and move on already.

Cheers,
aj

-- 
Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.

 "Security here. Yes, maam. Yes. Groucho glasses. Yes, we're on it.
   C'mon, guys. Somebody gave an aardvark a nose-cut: somebody who
    can't deal with deconstructionist humor. Code Blue."
		-- Mike Hoye,
		      see http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/armadillos.txt

Attachment: pgprJ7erdLG3L.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: