Re: Non-C/C++/ObjC source files in /usr/include subdirectories
On Wed, 21 Nov 2001, Chris Waters wrote:
> > How about using /usr/share/ada instead?
>
> Speaking for myself, yuck! I'd much prefer to use /usr/include for
> this. But I'm not an ada expert, and I don't know what the historical
> precedent (if any) is. Maybe we should find out how it's _supposed_
> to be done before we make a final and binding decision, eh?
There is precedent (kind of), g++ uses /usr/include/g++, so why not
/usr/include/{gnat|ada}?
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
#include <disclaimer.h>
Matthew Palmer
mjp16@ieee.uow.edu.au
Reply to: