[Sorry for hijacking an unrelated reply]
>*Addition to 13.5 Preferred documentation formats:
>
>HTML documents, if in encoding other than us-ascii, must
>have in their header an appropriate META tag describing the used encoding.
Shouldn't that be "iso-8859-1 (latin1)" instead of "us-ascii"? As,
IIRC, that is the official default encoding for HTML (according to
RFC2854/RFC2616).
I'm unsure about the must/should, though... I mean, "should" should
also be stuff that's not really critical, right? But a document that
I can't even get any reader to read due to not knowing which encoding
it's in (BTW, I liked your story about the ECMA-cyrillic doc ;-) is
not non-critical. But IANADD anyway...
Bye, J
--
Jürgen A. Erhard juergen.erhard@gmx.net phone: (GERMANY) 0721 27326
MARS: http://members.tripod.com/Juergen_Erhard/mars_index.html
Debian GNU/Linux (http://www.debian.org)
pros do it for money -- amateurs out of love.
Attachment:
pgpMsf5RSoCiu.pgp
Description: PGP signature