Re: [PROPOSAL]: encourage use of utf-8 in documentation and clarify encoding issues
On 07-Jun-01, 09:58 (CDT), Radovan Garabik <email@example.com> wrote:
> + <p>
> + Original upstream documentation, if in encoding other than UTF-8
> + or the well-established encoding for the particular language,
> + should be converted either to UTF-8 or to the well-established
> + encoding. Choice between UTF-8 and other encoding is left to the
> + maintainer discretion, however, one package should have all the
> + documentation in one consistent encoding for one language.
"the maintainer discretion" should be "the maintainer's
One suggestion: I think that last phrase might be better expressed as
"...however, the documentation for any single package should use
only one encoding."
Steve Greenland <firstname.lastname@example.org>
(Please do not CC me on mail sent to this list; I subscribe to and read
every list I post to.)