Re: Tightening up specification of /bin/sh
Zack Weinberg <zackw@stanford.edu> wrote:
>
> I'd like to tighten this up a bit by requiring that /bin/sh adhere to
> the consensus of implementations, where POSIX leaves things
> unspecified. What follows is one possible revision. The wording
> isn't ideal; I'm open to suggestions.
I object most strongly. The only reason why things like POSIX exists is
because in general there is no consensus.
--
Debian GNU/Linux 2.2 is out! ( http://www.debian.org/ )
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
Reply to: