Re: Must and should again
On 11-Apr-01, 18:05 (CDT), Julian Gilbey <J.D.Gilbey@qmw.ac.uk> wrote:
> [redef of MUST/SHOULD/MAY to RFC definitions; make def of RC bugs
> Does any of this sound reasonable? Anthony, what do you think of it?
> I know you've always gone by the "must = RC" route, but there are lots
> of people getting really confused by this whole thing, and I think
> that the RFC route is the far better known.
I, for one, like Julian's proposal.
Steve Greenland <email@example.com>
(Please do not CC me on mail sent to this list; I subscribe to and read
every list I post to.)