[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Must and should again

On 11-Apr-01, 18:05 (CDT), Julian Gilbey <J.D.Gilbey@qmw.ac.uk> wrote: 
> [redef of MUST/SHOULD/MAY to RFC definitions; make def of RC bugs
> orthogonal]
> Does any of this sound reasonable?  Anthony, what do you think of it?
> I know you've always gone by the "must = RC" route, but there are lots
> of people getting really confused by this whole thing, and I think
> that the RFC route is the far better known.

I, for one, like Julian's proposal.


Steve Greenland <stevegr@debian.org>
(Please do not CC me on mail sent to this list; I subscribe to and read
every list I post to.)

Reply to: