[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

RE: Must and should again

On 11-Apr-2001 Julian Gilbey wrote:
> We don't really have any standard way of saying "you really should do
> this as it's a really good thing to do, but there's no requirement to
> do so (and hence not a reason to file bug reports)".

I thought we were using RFC definitions of must and should, and thus 'may'

Must == have to do this
Should == we recommend you do this
May == we think it is a good idea, but is not always possible/sane/etc

Reply to: