Re: where are valid sections defined?

To: Sean 'Shaleh' Perry <shaleh@valinux.com>
Cc: Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho <gaia@iki.fi>, debian-policy@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: where are valid sections defined?
From: Josip Rodin <joy@cibalia.gkvk.hr>
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2001 02:00:04 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 20010327020004.A19168@cibalia.gkvk.hr>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] XFMail.20010326113127.shaleh@valinux.com>; from shaleh@valinux.com on Mon, Mar 26, 2001 at 11:31:27AM -0800
References: <[🔎] 20010326222333.A13794@gaia.iki.fi> <[🔎] XFMail.20010326113127.shaleh@valinux.com>

On Mon, Mar 26, 2001 at 11:31:27AM -0800, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
> The documentation for someone trying to pick up debian packaging is
> woefully weak.

Patches accepted :P

-- 
Digital Electronic Being Intended for Assassination and Nullification

Reply to:

References:
- Re: where are valid sections defined?
  - From: Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho <gaia@iki.fi>
- Re: where are valid sections defined?
  - From: "Sean 'Shaleh' Perry" <shaleh@valinux.com>

Prev by Date: Re: TrueType and non-free X fonts?
Next by Date: architecture-specific man pages (was Re: Policy does not speak of translated man pages)
Previous by thread: Re: where are valid sections defined?
Next by thread: Re: TrueType and non-free X fonts?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread