[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#88111: policy should not dictate implementation details



On Fri, Mar 02, 2001 at 06:18:31PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
> Wichert wrote:
> > I highly object to complicant the interface to debian/rules. 
> Anthony wrote:
> > But, uh, isn't that what you're doing?
> No, because allowing non-makefile rules files wouldn't require any changes
> to the interface (i.e. the ways of invoking the file).

Consider people actually trying to *use* the debian/rules though. Manoj has
posted some examples that won't work anymore. "make -j0 clean build binary"
might be another, for example.

> It seems Wichert also wants to move the defining of $DEB_* variables to the
> environment; that's a separate issue.

Not really.

Cheers,
aj

-- 
Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.

``_Any_ increase in interface difficulty, in exchange for a benefit you
  do not understand, cannot perceive, or don't care about, is too much.''
                      -- John S. Novak, III (The Humblest Man on the Net)

Attachment: pgp7tCHlQ8xJl.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: