On Thu, Mar 01, 2001 at 02:12:04PM +0100, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> Previously Anthony Towns wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 01, 2001 at 10:54:48AM +0000, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> > > [So I guess that we stick with debian/rules MUST be makefiles as
> > > well!]
> > Eh? Until there's an accepted amendment to change it, yes.
> Heh, when did that happen? That has never been obligatory, and I
> fail to see why it should.
It'll have happened during Manoj's incorporation of the packaging-manual
into policy. See 72949. You'll notice you seconded it... :)
Cheers,
aj, who actually thought he had too, but it appears not
--
Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.
``_Any_ increase in interface difficulty, in exchange for a benefit you
do not understand, cannot perceive, or don't care about, is too much.''
-- John S. Novak, III (The Humblest Man on the Net)
Attachment:
pgpNAcy9nFXJJ.pgp
Description: PGP signature