[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#88111: policy should not dictate implementation details



On Fri, Mar 02, 2001 at 02:38:41PM +0100, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> Previously Anthony Towns wrote:
> > But, uh, isn't that what you're doing? debian/rules has been a makefile
> > forever, allowing it to be anything else doesn't buy anything practical,
> It buys us freedom and room to experiment and innovate.

So does leaving it as a makefile. (See Joey H's example from earlier in the
thread)

Cheers,
aj, "freedom to innovate" indeed

-- 
Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.

``_Any_ increase in interface difficulty, in exchange for a benefit you
  do not understand, cannot perceive, or don't care about, is too much.''
                      -- John S. Novak, III (The Humblest Man on the Net)

Attachment: pgpRe_dYLuoxA.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: