[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#83063: PROPOSED] enhanced x-terminal-emulator policy



On Mon, Jan 22, 2001 at 04:43:12AM -0500, Raul Miller wrote:
> I think this change should say something about full screen support.

Full screen support?  What does that mean?  Maximizable to the size of the
root window?  Works well with the "screen" program?

> Otherwise, if 9term were modified such that -T is equivalent to -label,
> it would get the highest priority -- but it emulates a printer.

What are you talking about?  "The highest priority"?  You've evaluated all
terminal emulators in Debian already?  9term supports ISO 10646 combining
characters at implementation level 3?

If 9term emulates a printer, why is it called a terminal emulator?

-- 
G. Branden Robinson             |     To stay young requires unceasing
Debian GNU/Linux                |     cultivation of the ability to unlearn
branden@debian.org              |     old falsehoods.
http://www.debian.org/~branden/ |     -- Robert Heinlein

Attachment: pgpWbuLvWkWbl.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: