[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[RFC] Measuring skills of a Debian Developer



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160

Hello all,

      With increasing number of Debian Developers, it is getting hard
      to measure skill of a DD in a particular area of interest. For
      example there are DD's that make phenomenally good Debian
      packages, others are professional designers, others are genius
      in HTML, others grock Perl.

      My idea is that every DD's skills in should be recorded.

      For example it could be made by using additional fields in
      db.debian.org. For a start here is a list of categories I would
      like to see:
      basic packaging, advanced packaging, C, C++, Perl, Python, use
      of BTS, [add others here]
      The gradation should be from 0 to 10. A gradation of 0-5 would
      be too unprecise, while 0-100 will be too hard to do (read on).
      At first this info would be strictly informational while after
      some time (2 releases should do the trick), this info should be
      used to determine if a certain DD is skilled enough for a
      certain task (NMUing libc, packaging GPL'd Corel Draw :).
      There should be different ways to get the next level of certain
      skill. Some skills should be updated by scripts only ("bug
      fixing speed" :). Some could be based on a feedback from users.
      An some skills could be updated by passing some tests.
      There should also be a translation table for known
      certifications (Brainbench, RedHat, ... ).
      If there will be no good reasons against this, I'll work on a
      proposal.
      Comments? Ideas? Suggestions?
      
- -- 
Best regards,
 Aigars                          mailto:aigarius@mail.lv
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4-1 (MingW32)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
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=7HNe
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




Reply to: