Re: RFC: draft sub-policy for kernel patches
- To: Masato Taruishi <taru@debian.org>
- Cc: Yann Dirson <ydirson@altern.org>, debian-policy@lists.debian.org, srivasta@debian.org, dan@debian.org, ed@debian.org, herbert@debian.org, peter@makholm.net, holgate@debian.org, tor@slett.net, pa@debian.org, luther@debian.org
- Subject: Re: RFC: draft sub-policy for kernel patches
- From: Yann Dirson <ydirson@altern.org>
- Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2000 08:39:49 +0100
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20001102083949.A5670@bylbo.nowhere.earth>
- In-reply-to: <87u29ri1i8.wl@kimuchi>; from taru@debian.org on Thu, Nov 02, 2000 at 10:52:31AM +0900
- References: <[🔎] 20001101231706.A5247@bylbo.nowhere.earth> <87u29ri1i8.wl@kimuchi>
On Thu, Nov 02, 2000 at 10:52:31AM +0900, Masato Taruishi wrote:
> At Wed, 1 Nov 2000 23:17:07 +0100,
> Yann Dirson wrote:
>
> > As of now, I don't think a single patch package (including mines)
> > behaves correctly in all these areas. I have started a
> > `debhelper'-like script to help in this area and to provide a couple
> > additional functionalities. Those interested will find it at ..
>
>
> I've already wirtten a dh_installkernelpatch debhelper program,
> and now uses it in kernel-patch-pc9800 as a test.
Arg, duplicate work :} I'll have a look at it.
--
Yann Dirson <ydirson@altern.org> | Why make M$-Bill richer & richer ?
debian-email: <dirson@debian.org> | Support Debian GNU/Linux:
| Cheaper, more Powerful, more Stable !
http://ydirson.free.fr/ | Check <http://www.debian.org/>
Reply to: