[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: RFC: allow output from maintainer scripts



On Mon, Oct 30, 2000 at 09:22:02AM +1100, Brian May wrote:
> >>>>> "Anthony" == Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au> writes:
>     Anthony> Which will kludge up postinsts from now to forever, be an
>     Anthony> extra source for bugs, and make changing things in future
>     Anthony> awkward.
> I don't think we should downgrade the capability of future debian
> products, either just for the sake of back-words compatibility.

Just because we might choose not to add piles of cruft to our packages
right now, doesn't mean we can't change our mind later. We're not
downgrading anything.

Cheers,
aj

-- 
Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.

  ``We reject: kings, presidents, and voting.
                 We believe in: rough consensus and working code.''
                                      -- Dave Clark

Attachment: pgpeRy7DiFwN6.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: