On Wed, Oct 25, 2000 at 07:41:24AM -0700, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
> > This would require lots of changes to packages.
> so we change lots of packages.
Sure. But if anyone can think of a solution that gives the same results but
doesn't require changes to lots of packages, that'd be better.
So is that last wording sensible? Shall we make a proposal and get it
in policy?
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.
``We reject: kings, presidents, and voting.
We believe in: rough consensus and working code.''
-- Dave Clark
Attachment:
pgp6Z8LjVG2wp.pgp
Description: PGP signature