Re: Picking apart the packaging manual (long)
Previously Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Well, part of the difficulty in classifying this material is
> that one has to make the judement call on whether the things being
> referred to are supposed to be standard API's that shall not be
> lightly changed, and thus viable policy items, or they are merely the
> artifacts of current behaviour of the packaging system.
Agreed. What I would like to do is introduce changes in a dpkg reference
manual, and once they have settled done suggest copying them into
the policy manual. That gives me the freedom to make changes, while
keeping a stable policy manual. It does mean some duplication of text,
but I think we can manage that.
Wichert.
--
________________________________________________________________
/ Generally uninteresting signature - ignore at your convenience \
| wichert@liacs.nl http://www.liacs.nl/~wichert/ |
| 1024D/2FA3BC2D 576E 100B 518D 2F16 36B0 2805 3CB8 9250 2FA3 BC2D |
Reply to: