Re: Bug#62378: Redundant directory and package name
Steve Greenland wrote:
> On 21-Aug-00, 15:56 (CDT), Nicol?s Lichtmaier <nick@debian.org> wrote:
> > Besides, it would be nice to have many rfc packages: doc-rfc-mail,
> > doc-rfc-web, all of them puting packages in /usr/share/doc/rfc. And
> > there could be symlinkf pointing to the most recent versions of
> > standards: /usr/share/doc/rfc/HTTP would point to rfc2616.txt.
>
> This is a good argument. I think combined with Colin's idea that it be
> called /usr/share/doc/RFC (embracing and extending the HOWTO example) I
> could be in favor of it, as it avoids the package namespace.
I agree. This is good.
Reply to: